| |
| Home > Internet and online businesses |
| Google.cn:
The Internet As Beijing Sees It By Joseph Pratt (c) 2006 |
|
| In
November, I wrote an article and referenced a trip that ICMediaDirect.com's VP of Business Development, Diana Lee, took to China. She participated in Shanghai's inaugural ad:tech conference. It was a great trip and our company's ties with China are stronger because of it. Like most Western companies doing business in China, we're just doing business and there are no extenuating circumstances. Google, the giant search engine, cannot say the same. China is
an economic giant warming up to the power of the the search engine launched Google.cn with the purpose of staying competitive in the market, as China already has some big search engines of their own, Baidu specifically. But there is a price to pay. In a stance wholly contradictory to its stated purpose Google must censor websites that the Chinese government finds threatening. Just a few of these sites deemed not kosher include: Bacardi.com, date.com, collegehumor.com, jackdaniels.com, news.bbc.co.uk, pressfreedom.com, queernet.org, and teenpregnancy.org. So, in addition to sites deemed critical to Beijing, websites concerning sex, alcohol, and controversial issues are forbidden on Google.cn, as well. |
|
| Now
consider an excerpt from Google's IPO filing that reads: "Don't be evil. We believe strongly that in the long term, we will be better served - as shareholders and in all other ways - by a company that does good things for the world even if we forgo some short term gains. This is an important aspect of our culture and is broadly shared within the company." Google's foray into China is directly contradicting
their If nothing else, the last two or three years have shown
us the totally understandable. They knew they were in for a lump or two for caving to Beijing. They said that providing some information is better than providing none at all. In their own defense, Google cited that less than 2% of websites were to be censored on Google.cn - a mere pittance - yet this is the same company that derided Yahoo for having as little as 1% of their index as paid inclusion. Then it was about principle. Now it's about business. Principle, not surprisingly, can go take a hike. I repeat, Google's position is not wrong. It's almost
silly to A benefit of search is privacy and Google backs user
privacy to Could anyone actually believe that Google will protect
Chinese Until some big changes occur in Beijing I foresee much |
|
Joseph
Pratt Media Analyst ICMediaDirect.com (http://www.icmediadirect.com) email: joseph@icmediadirect.com |
|
|
This
article has been viewed
time(s). |
| Ezine - Guidelines and TOS - Add Your article - |